eDiscovery Guide
Analysis Articles
-
Analysis techniques can be helpful to individual reviewers. -
Initial case assessment and/or review frequently identify the need to collect additional materials -
Analysis techniques can help to ensure that you interview the right people and ask the right questions the first time. -
The review phase of electronic discovery is usually the most costly, time-consuming and error prone. -
Analysis can be conducted as soon as the first batch of documents and emails have been collected and processed -
Before starting an electronic discovery investigation, it is important to determine the scope of data to be collected and analyzed. -
Having explained the techniques and tools most suited to electronic discovery projects, it is important that we address some of the common pitfalls that one can fall into. -
The input to analysis is the output of processing, specifically a collection of culled and deduplicated electronic documents and emails with their associated metadata. -
Cases evolve. Frequently, the issues thought to be important at the outset are different from those that are found to be important later. -
Analysis is the process of evaluating a collection of electronic discovery materials to determine relevant summary information, such as key topics of the case, important people, specific vocabulary and jargon, and important individual documents.